A Market Report combines multiple screens with headers and commentary to form a live market brief. Each screen contributes one graph of an idea; the report explains how those graphs relate, where they disagree, and what a reader should monitor next.

Unlike a static PDF, screen membership and Screen Analysis™ update with the synced market data. The curator supplies the durable structure: thesis, screen selection, interpretation, risks, and update discipline. A useful report does not merely stack tables. It creates a path from question to evidence to conclusion.

A screen is one graph. A Market Report is the product.

Before composing, identify who the report serves and what they should understand after reading. “Daily market report” is too broad. “A morning risk brief for traders monitoring top-200 momentum, sector participation, and liquidity stress” determines which screens belong and what commentary matters.

Write a one-sentence thesis that can be tested by the report. Example: “Large-cap strength is holding, but participation outside the leaders is weakening.” This requires at least a large-cap leadership screen, a broader breadth screen, and evidence about concentration or laggards.

The thesis may be disproved by live data. That is healthy. Update the commentary when the evidence changes instead of selecting only screens that preserve yesterday’s narrative.

A strong sequence moves from broad context to focused implications:

1. Market state: a broad, stable universe such as top-100 or top-500 assets.
2. Participation: allGreen/allRed breadth, day breadth, or trend structure.
3. Leadership: strongest sectors, categories, or size buckets.
4. Risk: weak, high-risk, illiquid, concentrated, or deeply discounted sets.
5. Watch next: a focused screen whose membership could confirm or challenge the thesis.

Each screen should answer a different part of the report question. Two nearly identical momentum screens add length without adding evidence. Contrast is valuable: large versus small, leaders versus laggards, broad breadth versus concentrated value.

Screen Analysis already reports breadth, benchmark performance, liquidity, concentration, themes, and leaders. Curator commentary should synthesize rather than repeat every number. Explain why the screen is present, which tension matters, and what would change the interpretation.

A useful note follows this pattern: observation → meaning → limitation → next check. “Fourteen of 20 assets are up today, but only five are allGreen. The category is bouncing without broad multi-window confirmation. Two thin names lead the return table, so watch whether volume spreads into the middle of the list.”

Avoid unsupported certainty, unexplained jargon, and generic lines such as “market looks interesting.” Name the screen, denominator, time window, and evidence behind the claim.

Because embedded screens update, yesterday’s commentary can become stale even while the table remains current. Write durable notes about what a screen measures, then timestamp or revise claims tied to a specific market state. Readers should be able to distinguish a standing framework from a current observation.

When membership changes, ask why. A coin may cross a market-cap boundary, lose a signal, gain volume, or move out of a percentage range. The report is behaving correctly when its rule responds to data.

Do not promise real-time execution data. Pages read the local database from completed syncs. If coverage is missing, say so. Honest staleness and empty states create more trust than precise language built on unavailable values.

1. Broad market pulse: Use a top-200 screen to establish day breadth, overall mood, and performance versus Bitcoin.
2. Confirmed strength: Add an allGreen screen with a volume floor. Explain whether strength is broad, concentrated, or dominated by one theme.
3. Where momentum is fading: Add allGreen + downTrend or another cooling set. Contrast continued positive alignment with weaker short-window ordering.
4. Risk pocket: Add a liquid allRed screen. Identify whether weakness is isolated or shared across categories.
5. What changes the thesis: Conclude with measurable conditions: broader allGreen participation, improved median performance versus Bitcoin, or expanding volume outside current leaders.

Keep a Market Report private while developing its structure or using it for personal research. Publish it free when the goal is education, reach, and curator reputation. Paid access should be reserved for curation that delivers ongoing value: a clear niche, disciplined updates, transparent methodology, and interpretation readers cannot get from an unstructured table.

Price does not turn a weak report into a product. Before charging, ensure the report states its audience, follows a repeatable framework, avoids hidden survivorship bias, and updates commentary when the evidence changes.

Public and paid reports both benefit from the same trust signals: specific claims, visible screens, honest limitations, consistent vocabulary, and a clear distinction between education and investment advice.

• Coherent: every screen supports one report question.
• Interpretable: notes explain “so what for this list?” in plain English.
• Auditable: readers can trace claims to rows and Screen Analysis.
• Balanced: risks, missing data, and conflicting evidence remain visible.
• Current: state-dependent commentary is reviewed as live results change.
• Distinct: the report adds synthesis rather than duplicating the screener.
• Responsible: educational claims never become guaranteed outcomes or personalized advice.

Curator reputation should reward clarity and useful repetition, not noise. A smaller report with a strong method is more valuable than a long collection of unrelated screens.

1. Can a reader identify the audience and thesis immediately?
2. Does each screen add a distinct piece of evidence?
3. Does the order move from context to implication?
4. Do notes synthesize instead of merely restating SA?
5. Are denominators, windows, and benchmark comparisons clear?
6. Are concentration, liquidity, and missing-data limitations disclosed?
7. Does the conclusion say what would confirm or challenge the thesis?
8. Is access—private, free, or paid—appropriate for the current quality and cadence?

If the report passes this checklist, publish it as a living brief and revisit it on a stated rhythm. The durable value is not predicting every move; it is giving readers a consistent way to understand what the selected parts of the market are doing.